ArticleScientific reports2024
A blended framework for audio spoof detection with sequential models and bags of auditory bites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An automated speaker verification system uses the process of speech recognition to verify the identity of a user and block illicit access. Logical access attacks are efforts to obtain access to a system by tampering with its algorithms or data, or by circumventing security mechanisms. DeepFake attacks are a form of logical access threats that employs artificial intelligence to produce highly realistic audio clips of human voice, that may be used to circumvent vocal authentication systems. This paper presents a framework for the detection of Logical Access and DeepFake audio spoofings by integrating audio file components and time-frequency representation spectrograms into a lower-dimensional space using sequential prediction models. Bidirectional-LSTM trained on the bonafide class generates significant one-dimensional features for both classes. The feature set is then standardized to a fixed set using a novel Bags of Auditory Bites (BoAB) feature standardizing algorithm. The Extreme Learning Machine maps the feature space to predictions that differentiate between genuine and spoofed speeches. The framework is evaluated using the ASVspoof 2021 dataset, a comprehensive collection of audio recordings designed for evaluating the strength of speaker verification systems against spoofing attacks. It achieves favorable results on synthesized DeepFake attacks with an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 1.18% in the most optimal setting. Logical Access attacks were more challenging to detect at an EER of 12.22%. Compared to the state-of-the-arts in the ASVspoof2021 dataset, the proposed method notably improves EER for DeepFake attacks by an improvement rate of 95.16%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.