Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215045›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Early morning hour and evening usage habits increase misinformation-spread.

Elisabeth Stockinger, Riccardo Gallotti, Carina I Hausladen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisabeth StockingerComputational Social Science, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland. elisabeth.stockinger@live.at.
Riccardo GallottiComplex Human Behaviour Lab, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, 38123, Italy.
Carina I HausladenComputational Social Science, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 952026HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme 101070190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media manipulation poses a significant threat to cognitive autonomy and unbiased opinion formation. Prior literature explored the relationship between online activity and emotional state, cognitive resources, sunlight and weather. However, a limited understanding exists regarding the role of time of day in content spread and the impact of user activity patterns on susceptibility to mis- and disinformation. This work uncovers a strong correlation between user activity time patterns and the tendency to spread potentially disinformative content. Through quantitative analysis of Twitter (now X) data, we examine how user activity throughout the day aligns with diurnal behavioural archetypes. Evening types exhibit a significantly higher inclination towards spreading potentially disinformative content, which is more likely at night-time. This knowledge can become crucial for developing targeted interventions and strategies that mitigate misinformation spread by addressing vulnerable periods and user groups more susceptible to manipulation.

Indexed as

CommunicationSocial MediaHabitsHumansTime FactorsComputational social scienceDiurnal patternsHuman behaviourMisinformation spreadSocial media

Identifiers

PMID39215045
PMCPMC11364767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.