Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39214991›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Machine learning on quantum experimental data toward solving quantum many-body problems.

Gyungmin Cho, Dohun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gyungmin ChoDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, and Institute of Applied Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea. km950501@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3802-6663
Dohun KimDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, and Institute of Applied Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea. dohunkim@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9687-2089

Funding

Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI) 2021R1A6C101B418National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2019M3E4A1080144National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2019M3E4A1080145National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2019R1A5A1027055National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2020M3H3A1110365National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2023R1A2C2005809National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) RS-2023-00207732National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) RS-2023-00283291National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) RS-2024-00413957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in the implementation of quantum hardware have enabled the acquisition of data that are intractable for emulation with classical computers. The integration of classical machine learning (ML) algorithms with these data holds potential for unveiling obscure patterns. Although this hybrid approach extends the class of efficiently solvable problems compared to using only classical computers, this approach has been only realized for solving restricted problems because of the prevalence of noise in current quantum computers. Here, we extend the applicability of the hybrid approach to problems of interest in many-body physics, such as predicting the properties of the ground state of a given Hamiltonian and classifying quantum phases. By performing experiments with various error-reducing procedures on superconducting quantum hardware with 127 qubits, we managed to acquire refined data from the quantum computer. This enabled us to demonstrate the successful implementation of theoretically suggested classical ML algorithms for systems with up to 44 qubits. Our results verify the scalability and effectiveness of the classical ML algorithms for processing quantum experimental data.

Identifiers

PMID39214991
PMCPMC11364692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.