ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2024
Major Complications of Deep Venous Stenting.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fragmented Iliac Venous Stent Migration Requiring Tricuspid Valve Replacement.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Intravascular Ultrasound Findings in Acute and Chronic Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Lower Extremities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDeep venous stent placement has developed into a primary treatment modality for venous obstruction in recent decades. Reported rates of complications are low in the literature and are based mainly on case reports and single-centre cohorts. Interventionalists performing these procedures must be aware of the occurrence of complications associated with stent placement to counsel patients adequately and promote avoidance through optimal procedural approach. This study aims to determine the incidence of serious complications associated with iliocaval and iliofemoral stent placement in a cohort of patients from 3 major tertiary deep venous referral centres.
methodsData were collated from January 2014 to September 2023. The following major complications were included in the analysis: death, major bleeding requiring transfusion, massive pulmonary embolism, any complication which required endovascular or open surgical intervention, vessel rupture, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, stent crushing, fracture, migration, involution or erosion.
resultsOne thousand eight hundred fourteen (1814) patients were treated for acute or chronic deep venous pathology during the 9-year study period. Sixty-one patients (3.3%) experienced a major stent-related complication. The most frequently reported complication was stent crushing (n = 18, 29.5%), followed by stent fracture (n = 10, 16.4%) and erosion of the stent through the vessel wall (n = 8, 13.1%). Death was a rare event (0.2%).
conclusionDeep venous stent placement is a safe procedure with low rates of major complications. It is incumbent upon operators to be aware of the risks associated with these procedures, however, rare, so that they may obtain fully informed consent from patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39214918What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.