ArticleCurrent microbiology2024
Rhizobacterial Community Structure Differs Between Landrace and Cultivar of Rice Under Drought Conditions.
Article in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rhizosphere plays a critical role in crop growth and fitness, particularly under moisture-stress conditions. Modern breeding has diminished the ability of crops to recruit beneficial microbiomes, making them more vulnerable to drought, unlike wild types and landraces that adapt better. This study aims to elucidate how rice landrace and cultivar influence the rhizosphere bacterial communities and biochemical attributes under normal and moisture stress conditions. Rhizospheres of rice landrace, Norungan, and high-yielding cultivar, Co51, were assessed using soil biochemical and 16S rRNA gene sequencing approaches. Drought negatively impacted soil carbon pools, enzymes, and respiration in the rhizospheres of both genotypes. However, Norungan's rhizosphere showed less harm than Co51's. During drought, reductions in soil organic carbon (3.94%), microbial biomass carbon (14.26%), labile carbon (1.94%), dehydrogenase (10.1%), urease (21.27%), phosphatase (9.61%), and respiration rate (15.02%) were more pronounced in Co51 than in Norungan. Alpha diversity of rhizosphere bacterial communities was significantly lower than bulk soil, with drought further reducing diversity in both genotypes. Drought decreased the abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in Norungan's rhizosphere while it increased the abundance of Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Proteobacteria. Conversely, in Co51's rhizosphere, drought enhanced the abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes while reducing the abundance of Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria. These results suggest that under moisture-stress conditions, the landrace Norungan recruits less-diversified, specific groups of microorganisms to augment the rhizosphere's functioning. This study underscores the need to develop strategies for cultivars and hybrids with enhanced rhizosphere resilience during drought conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39214888What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.