ReviewNeurosurgical review2024
Dissecting and fusiform aneurysms of the superior cerebellar artery: anatomy, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of superior cerebellar aneurysms is still controversial. Although several techniques are available, the deep localization of the lesion and the limited number of cases increase the complexity of decision-making for optimal treatment. Only a few cases of dissecting and fusiform aneurysms of the superior cerebellar artery (SCA) are described in the literature, many of which are without long follow-ups. The study aims to offer an exhaustive retrospective analysis of patients affected by SCA fusiform and dissecting aneurysms treated at our institution from 2008 to 2023, highlighting outcomes and complications. Moreover, a comprehensive narrative review was performed. A total of seven patients were treated at our institution. After a title and abstract screen, fifty-five papers met the criteria for inclusion in the review. In our case series, conservative treatment was proposed as the first therapeutic option in four cases (57.1%), while endovascular treatment (EVT) was in three cases (42.9%). A good recovery was observed in 66% of patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), while every patient without SAH achieved a good clinical outcome. A poor outcome was observed only in one patient with a dissecting aneurysm causing SAH, who also suffered a pontine infarction. In the literature review, conservative treatment was proposed as a first therapeutic option in eleven cases (16.6%), open microsurgical techniques in 19 patients (28.8%), and EVT in 31 patients (46.9%). Fatal outcome was documented in five patients (7.5%), all characterized by the rupture of the vascular lesion, while 6.1% of cases had non-fatal poor outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39214870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.