Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39214613›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2024

Competing Kinetic Consequences of CO

Sichi Li, Yoseph Guta, Marcos F Calegari Andrade, Elwin Hunter-Sellars, Amitesh Maiti, Anthony J Varni, Paco Tang, Carsten Sievers, Simon H Pang, Christopher W Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Solid phosphate buffers boost COCommunications chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of Polymer Architecture in COACS applied polymer materials · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Brain-Targeting siRNA Delivery to Tackle Alzheimer's Disease.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sichi LiMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2565-5906
Yoseph GutaSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Marcos F Calegari AndradeMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8630-7393
Elwin Hunter-SellarsMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Amitesh MaitiMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Anthony J VarniMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2288-5957
Paco TangSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Carsten SieversSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Simon H PangMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2913-1648
Christopher W JonesSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3255-5791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amine-functionalized porous solid materials are effective sorbents for direct air capture (DAC) of CO

Identifiers

PMID39214613
PMCPMC11487567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.