Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39214522›Full record

SynthesisDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2024

Standard length of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Edoardo Vespa, Alberto Barchi, Francesco Vito Mandarino, Ernesto Fasulo, Maria Caterina Fratto, Sandro Passaretti, Francesco Azzolini, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Silvio Danese

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Edoardo VespaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5573-447X
Alberto BarchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Francesco Vito MandarinoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Ernesto FasuloDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Maria Caterina FrattoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Sandro PassarettiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Francesco AzzoliniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Edoardo Vincenzo SavarinoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3187-2894
Silvio DaneseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment for achalasia, yet there is still a lack of technical standardization. No clear definition of 'long', 'standard', or 'short' POEM exists to date. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to analyze current POEM length standards. We included studies reporting technical details of POEM, in which no definite or comparative myotomy length was intentionally adopted (standard myotomy). The primary outcome was the pooled mean total myotomy length. Sub-group analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity across studies. From the initial 7172 records, 31 studies with 3023 patients were included. Pooled mean of total myotomy length was 10.39 cm (95% CI 10.06-10.71; I2 99.3%). Pooled mean of esophageal and gastric myotomy length, provided by 17 studies, was 7.11 cm (95% CI 6.51-7.71; I2 99.8%) and 2.81 cm (95% CI 2.41-3-22; I2 99.8%), respectively. On subgroup analysis for achalasia subtypes, pooled mean length in non-spastic achalasia (type I and II) was 10.17 cm (95% CI 9.91-10.43; I2 94.2%), while in type III it was 14.02 cm (95% CI 10.59-17.44; I2 98.9%). Pooled mean myotomy length for studies conducted between 2014-2020 was 10.53 cm (95% CI, 10.22-10.84; I2 99.1%) and 9.74 cm (95% CI, 7.95-11.54; I2 99.7%) in 2021-2022. Myotomy length during a 'standard' POEM is 10.4 cm, remaining over 10 cm in non-spastic achalasia. The high heterogeneity across studies confirms that the POEM technique needs further standardization. We found no significant time trend towards adopting short POEM, despite recent evidence supporting its use.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaMyotomyAdultAgedEsophagoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryTreatment Outcomeachalasiaendoscopyesophageal motilitymyotomy

Identifiers

PMID39214522
PMCPMC11605639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.