Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39214044›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2024

The big mixup: Neural representation during natural modes of primate visual behavior.

David A Leopold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David A LeopoldSection on Cognitive Neurophysiology and Imaging, Systems Neurodevelopment Laboratory, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: leopoldd@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Neurophysiology of Visual PerceptionZIAMH002838 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI LEOPOLD, DAVID A · 2009 to 2025
$14.0M
Visual Adaptation and Neuronal SelectivityZIAMH002898 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI LEOPOLD, DAVID A · 2009 to 2025
$13.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002838Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primate brain has evolved specialized visual capacities to navigate complex physical and social environments. Researchers studying cortical circuits underlying these capacities have traditionally favored the use of simplified tasks and brief stimulus presentations in order to isolate cognitive variables with tight experimental control. As a result, operational theories about visual brain function have come to emphasize feature detection, hierarchical stimulus encoding, top-down task modulation, and functional segregation in distinct cortical areas. Recently, however, experimental paradigms combining natural behavior with electrophysiological recordings have begun to offer a distinctly different portrait of how the brain takes in and analyzes its visual surroundings. The present article reviews recent work in this area, highlighting some of the more surprising findings in domains of social vision and spatial navigation along with shifts in thinking that have begun to emanate from this approach.

Indexed as

PrimatesVisual PerceptionAnimalsBrainHumansVisual CortexVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID39214044
PMCPMC11392606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.