Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39213524›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Application and Evaluation of a Multimodal Training on the Second Victim Phenomenon at the European Researchers' Network Working on Second Victims Training School: Mixed Methods Study.

Sofia Guerra-Paiva, José Joaquín Mira, Reinhard Strametz, Joana Fernandes, Victoria Klemm, Andrea Madarasova Geckova, Bojana Knezevic, Eva Potura, Sandra Buttigieg, Irene Carrillo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sofia Guerra-PaivaNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4311-3799
José Joaquín MiraAlicante-Sant Joan Health District, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6497-083X
Reinhard StrametzWiesbaden Institute for Healthcare Economics and Patient Safety, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9920-8674
Joana FernandesNOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4759-3996
Victoria KlemmWiesbaden Institute for Healthcare Economics and Patient Safety, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6197-9847
Andrea Madarasova GeckovaDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-2993-3798
Bojana KnezevicDepartment for Quality Assurance and Improvement in Health Care, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-5525-3775
Eva PoturaGesundheit Österreich GmbH, Bundesinstitut für Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0009-1713-1510
Sandra ButtigiegDepartment of Health Systems Management and Leadership, Faculty of Health Sciences,University of Malta, Malta, Malta.ORCID 0000-0002-0572-2462
Irene CarrilloDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6981-7284
Paulo SousaNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9502-6075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care workers (HCWs) are often impacted by distressing situations during patient care and can experience the second victim phenomenon (SVP). Addressing an adequate response, training, and increasing awareness of the SVP can increase HCWs' well-being and ultimately improve the quality of care and patient safety.

objectiveThis study aims to describe and evaluate a multimodal training organized by the European Researchers' Network Working on Second Victims to increase knowledge and overall awareness of SVP and second victim programs.

methodsWe implemented a multimodal training program, following an iterative approach based on a continuous quality improvement process, to enhance the methodology and materials of the training program over the duration of 2 years. We conducted web-based surveys and group interviews to evaluate the scope and design of the training, self-directed learning materials, and face-to-face activities.

resultsOut of 42 accepted candidates, 38 (90%) participants attended the 2 editions of the Training School program. In the second edition, the level of participants' satisfaction increased, particularly when adjusting the allocated time for the case studies' discussion (P<.001). After the multimodal training, participants stated that they had a better awareness and understanding of the SVP, support interventions, and its impact on health care. The main strengths of this Training School were the interdisciplinary approach as well as the contact with multiple cultures, the diversity of learning materials, and the commitment of the trainers and organizing team.

conclusionsThis multimodal training is suitable for different stakeholders of the health care community, including HCWs, clinical managers, patient safety and quality-of-care teams, academicians, researchers, and postgraduate students, regardless of their prior experience with SVP. Furthermore, this study represents a pioneering effort in elucidating the materials and methodology essential for extending this training approach to similar contexts.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelEuropeHumansProgram EvaluationResearch PersonnelSurveys and Questionnaireseducationhealthcarepatient safetysecond victimtraining

Identifiers

PMID39213524
PMCPMC11418314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.