ArticleAmerican journal of clinical pathology2025
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia: The role of the CK7 immunohistochemistry pattern of expression in diagnosis.
Article in American journal of clinical pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) is a rare vascular disorder of the liver. Clinically, patients present with portal hypertension with or without a cholestatic pattern of injury. Histologically, the liver parenchyma is composed of small nodules of hypertrophic hepatocytes surrounded by atrophic hepatocytes without significant fibrosis. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia is a difficult diagnosis on biopsy specimens, but biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis. In this retrospective review, cytokeratin 7 (CK7) immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to aid in the diagnosis and further characterization of NRH and NRH-like changes.
methodsThe H&E-stained slides, reticulin, and CK IHC were reviewed for 22 cases. The percentage of hepatocytes staining for CK7 (0%-100%), the location of staining (centrilobular hepatic progenitor cells vs periportal/bile ductular reaction), and the pattern of staining distribution (patchy or diffuse) were recorded for comparison.
resultsOf the 22 cases, 9 were CK7 positive. Cases of NRH, however, expressed various degrees of CK7 positivity in centrilobular hepatic progenitor cells, unlike NRH-like changes, which were either CK7 negative or CK7 positive in periportal hepatocytes or in areas of bile ductular reaction.
conclusionsIn cases with the appropriate clinical history and histology, CK7 immunohistochemistry can be performed to distinguish nodular regenerative hyperplasia (primary) and NRH-like changes (secondary). In difficult cases, CK7 positivity in centrilobular hepatic progenitor cells can help confirm the diagnosis of NRH. These data support NRH as a true entity with a distinct pathophysiology from NRH-like changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.