ArticlePloS one2024
Factors associated with glycaemic control and diabetes complications in patients at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania: A cross-sectional study design.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expert patients improve health literacy, self-care attitudes, and practices in people with diabetes: a quasi-experimental study in Tanzania.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Poor Glycemic Control in East Africa: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Public Health Implications in Diabetes Management.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Review
- Power Within: a meta-analysis of the roles of self-efficacy in type 2 diabetes self-care and glycaemic control.BMJ public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlycaemic control is essential for improving the quality of life in patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Untreated hyperglycaemia can result in numerous severe and life-threatening complications, such as damage to the eyes, kidneys, nerves, heart, and peripheral vascular system. Appropriate glycaemic control and management is fundamental to prevent and delay diabetes complications. Therefore, this study aims to assess the prevalence of poor glycaemic control, its associated factors, and the prevalence of diabetes-related complications among DM patients.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 340 DM patients treated at Bugando Medical Center from 4th - 30th April 2023 to determine the prevalence of poor glycaemic control and its predictors. Secondary data from 7952 DM patients treated between April 2022 and 30th May 2023 were used to determine DM-related complications. STATA 15 version …was used for analysis.
resultsOut of 340 patients, 66.4% had poor glycaemic control with HbA1c or Random Blood Glucose greater than 7% or 7mmol/L, respectively. Older age, duration of DM of more than 10 years, insulin therapy, and those unaware of glycaemic target goals were factors associated with poor glycaemic control. (AOR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.28-6.01, P = 0.03), (AOR: 3.15, 95% CI: 2.22-6.55, P = 0.016), (AOR: 3.07, 95% CI: 2.10-6.12, P = 0.022) and (AOR: 3.42, 95% CI: 2.17-5.97, P = 0.001), respectively. Of the 7952 patient records reviewed indicated that 44.5% had complications, of which 25.8% had neurological complications and 55.3% had multiple complications.
conclusionTwo-third of DM patients failed to achieve good glycaemic control and about half of the patient's records reviewed indicated they developed diabetic complications. Thus appropriate interventions are necessary to improve glycaemic control and prevent or control complications among DM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.