ArticleBlood advances2024
Autologous stem cell transplantation in T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma: EBMT Lymphoma Working Party study.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma: An EBMT lymphoma working party study.Leukemia · 2026Article
- A Large Room for Improvement in the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Türkiye: Real-World Outcomes in a Setting Without Access to T-Cell Redirecting TherapiesTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAlthough broadly used, consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) has never been specifically investigated. Here, we have analyzed outcomes of auto-HCT for THRLBCL compared with diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (DLBCL). Eligible for this retrospective registry study were adult patients with R/R THRLBCL and DLBCL, respectively, who underwent a first auto-HCT in a salvage-sensitive disease status as assessed by positron emission tomography-computed tomography between 2016 and 2021 and were registered with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) 2 years after transplantation. A total of 201 patients with THRLBCL and 5543 with DLBCL were included. There were no significant differences in terms of disease status at HCT, pretreatment lines, and interval from diagnosis to transplant between the cohorts, but patients with THRLBCL were significantly younger, contained a higher proportion of men, and had a better performance status. Compared with DLBCL, THRLBCL was associated with significantly better 2-year PFS (78% vs 59%; P < .001) and overall survival (OS, 81% vs 74%; P = .02) because of a significantly lower 2-year relapse incidence (16% vs 35%; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, favorable relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.7) and PFS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82) of patients with THRLBCL remained significant, whereas OS benefits (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.54-1.12) did not. These results were validated in a propensity score-matched analysis. These data prove auto-HCT as an effective treatment option for salvage-sensitive R/R THRLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.