ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024
Genomic factors shaping codon usage across the Saccharomycotina subphylum.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- GGAR: gradient guided adaptive regularization enhances deep learning classification of brassica species using codon usage bias.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Genes near tRNAs are enriched in translational machinery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Synonymous codon usage defines functional gene families.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Integrative genomic and machine learning approaches reveal evolutionary signatures in the winged bean mitochondrial genome.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Genetic and phenotypic diversity of wine-associated Hanseniaspora species.FEMS yeast research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Codon usage bias, or the unequal use of synonymous codons, is observed across genes, genomes, and between species. It has been implicated in many cellular functions, such as translation dynamics and transcript stability, but can also be shaped by neutral forces. We characterized codon usage across 1,154 strains from 1,051 species from the fungal subphylum Saccharomycotina to gain insight into the biases, molecular mechanisms, evolution, and genomic features contributing to codon usage patterns. We found a general preference for A/T-ending codons and correlations between codon usage bias, GC content, and tRNA-ome size. Codon usage bias is distinct between the 12 orders to such a degree that yeasts can be classified with an accuracy >90% using a machine learning algorithm. We also characterized the degree to which codon usage bias is impacted by translational selection. We found it was influenced by a combination of features, including the number of coding sequences, BUSCO count, and genome length. Our analysis also revealed an extreme bias in codon usage in the Saccharomycodales associated with a lack of predicted arginine tRNAs that decode CGN codons, leaving only the AGN codons to encode arginine. Analysis of Saccharomycodales gene expression, tRNA sequences, and codon evolution suggests that avoidance of the CGN codons is associated with a decline in arginine tRNA function. Consistent with previous findings, codon usage bias within the Saccharomycotina is shaped by genomic features and GC bias. However, we find cases of extreme codon usage preference and avoidance along yeast lineages, suggesting additional forces may be shaping the evolution of specific codons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.