ReviewJournal of leukocyte biology2024
Advancing toward a unified eosinophil signature from transcriptional profiling.
Review in Journal of leukocyte biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolically reprogrammed eosinophils impair T cell immunity and cause chronic skin infection.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- A time-series transcriptomic dataset of the mouse olfactory bulb across pregnancy and lactation.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Single-cell transcriptomics of granulocytes in asthma and atopic diseases.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eosinophils are granulocytes that can accumulate in increased numbers in tissues and/or peripheral blood in disease. Phenotyping of eosinophils in health and disease has the potential to improve the precision of diagnosis and choice of therapies for eosinophilic-associated diseases. Transcriptional profiling of eosinophils has been plagued by cell fragility and difficulty isolating high-quality RNA. With several technological advances, single-cell RNA sequencing has become possible with eosinophils, at least from mice, while bulk RNA sequencing and microarrays have been performed in both murine and human samples. Anticipating more eosinophil transcriptional profiles in the coming years, we provide a summary of prior studies conducted on mouse and human eosinophils in blood and tissue, with a discussion of the advantages and potential pitfalls of various approaches. Common technical standards in studying eosinophil biology would help advance the field and make cross-study comparisons possible. Knowledge gaps and opportunities include identifying a minimal set of genes that define the eosinophil lineage, comparative studies between active disease and remission vs. homeostasis or development, especially in humans, and a comprehensive comparison between murine and human eosinophils at the transcriptional level. Characterizing such transcriptional patterns will be important to understanding the complex and diverse roles of eosinophils in both health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.