Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39213073›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2024

The Profile of the Italian Centers for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia in the Context of New Drugs in Alzheimer's Disease.

Francesco Giaquinto, Patrizia Lorenzini, Emanuela Salvi, Giulia Carnevale, Roberta Vaccaro, Fabio Matascioli, Massimo Corbo, Nicoletta Locuratolo, Nicola Vanacore, Ilaria Bacigalupo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Italian intersocietal recommendations for restructuring the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway for the implementation and appropriate use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesco GiaquintoDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Patrizia LorenziniNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Emanuela SalviNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Giulia CarnevaleItalian National Institute of Health FONDEM Study Group, Rome, Italy.
Roberta VaccaroItalian National Institute of Health FONDEM Study Group, Rome, Italy.
Fabio MatascioliItalian National Institute of Health FONDEM Study Group, Rome, Italy.
Massimo CorboDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Cura Igea, Milan, Italy.
Nicoletta LocuratoloNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Nicola VanacoreNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Ilaria BacigalupoNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
National Dementia Plan Study Group
CCDDs Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The wait for the upcoming disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for Alzheimer's disease in Europe is raising questions about the preparedness of national healthcare systems to conduct accurate diagnoses and effective prescriptions. In this article, we focus on the current situation in Italy. Objective: The primary goal is to propose a profile of the Italian Centers for Cognitive Disorders and Dementias (CCDDs) that could be taken into consideration by regional and autonomous provincial authorities when deciding on the prescribing centers for DMT. Methods: Based on responses to a national survey on CCDDs in Italy, we identified the CCDDs that meet the requirements for effective prescription: 1) Multidisciplinary team; 2) Minimum Core Test for the neuropsychological assessment; 3) PET, CSF, and Brain MRI assessments. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were conducted between CCDDs that met the criteria and the others. Results: Only 10.4% of CCDDs met the requirements for effective DMT prescription, mainly located in Northern Italy. They are also characterized by longer opening hours, a higher number of professionals, a university location, and a higher frequency of conducting genetic tests, and could potentially result in prescribing centers. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the Italian national healthcare system may benefit from further enhancements to facilitate the effective prescription of DMTs. This could involve initiatives to reduce fragmentation, ensure adequate resources and equipment, and secure sufficient funding to support this aspect of healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaCognition DisordersHumansItalyNeuropsychological TestsAlzheimer’s diseaseCenters for Cognitive Disorders and Dementiascognitive assessmentdisease-modifying therapymemory clinicpublic health

Identifiers

PMID39213073
PMCPMC11492016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.