Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39213024›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

EXploring Patterns of Use and Effects of Adult Day Programs to Improve Trajectories of Continuing Care (EXPEDITE): Protocol for a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Matthias Hoben, Colleen J Maxwell, Andrea Ubell, Malcolm B Doupe, Zahra Goodarzi, Saleema Allana, Ron Beleno, Whitney Berta, Jennifer Bethell, Tamara Daly and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06440447 (EXploring Patterns of Use and Effects of Adult Day Programs to Improve Trajectories of Continuing CarE), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06440447 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

EXploring Patterns of Use and Effects of Adult Day Programs to Improve Trajectories of Continuing CarE (EXPEDITE)

TypeobservationalSponsorYork UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled500,000ConditionsAdult Day Programs, Continuing Care, Old Age, DementiaArmsAdult day program use, Other community care (non-attendees)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Matthias HobenSchool of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3465-315X
Colleen J MaxwellSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7988-2899
Andrea UbellAlzheimer Society of York Region, Aurora, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-6285-3293
Malcolm B DoupeMax Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6889-9097
Zahra GoodarziCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8858-4076
Saleema AllanaArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8052-8299
Ron BelenoMember of the Advisory Committee, Helen Carswell Chair in Dementia Care, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-3465-1401
Whitney BertaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9934-8450
Jennifer BethellICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6141-9011
Tamara DalySchool of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1455-1340
Liane GinsburgSchool of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4436-9198
Atiqur Sm- RahmanSchool of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7675-2415
Hung NguyenSchool of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9604-4267
Kaitlyn TateFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3711-7515
Kimberlyn McGrailCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9349-1915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdult day programs provide critical supports to older adults and their family or friend caregivers. High-quality care in the community for as long as possible and minimizing facility-based continuing care are key priorities of older adults, their caregivers, and health care systems. While most older adults in need of care live in the community, about 10% of newly admitted care home residents have relatively low care needs that could be met in the community with the right supports. However, research on the effects of day programs is inconsistent. The methodological quality of studies is poor, and we especially lack robust, longitudinal research.

objectiveOur research objectives are to (1) compare patterns of day program use (including nonuse) by province (Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba) and time; (2) compare characteristics of older adults by day program use pattern (including nonuse), province, and time; and (3) assess effects of day programs on attendees, compared with a propensity score-matched cohort of older nonattendees in the community.

methodsIn this population-based retrospective cohort study, we will use clinical and health administrative data of older adults (65+ years of age) who received publicly funded continuing care in the community in the Canadian provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2024. We will compare patterns of day program use between provinces and assess changes over time. We will then compare characteristics of older adults (eg, age, sex, physical or cognitive disability, area-based deprivation indices, and caregiver availability or distress) by pattern of day program use or nonuse, province, and time. Finally, we will create a propensity score-matched comparison group of older adults in the community, who have not attended a day program. Using time-to-event models and general estimating equations, we will assess whether day program attendees compared with nonattendees enter care homes later; use emergency, acute, or primary care less frequently; experience less cognitive and physical decline; and have better mental health.

resultsThis will be a 3-year study (July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2027). We received ethics approvals from the relevant ethics boards. Starting on July 1, 2024, we will work with the 3 provincial health systems on data access and linkage, and we expect data analyses to start in early 2025.

conclusionsThis study will generate robust Canadian evidence on the question whether day programs have positive, negative, or no effects on various older adult and caregiver outcomes. This will be a prerequisite to improving the quality of care provided to older adults in day programs, ultimately improving the quality of life of older adults and their caregivers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06440447; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06440447. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/60896.

Indexed as

Adult Day Care CentersAgedAged, 80 and overAlbertaBritish ColumbiaContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansMaleManitobaObservational Studies as TopicRetrospective Studiesadult day care centersagedcohort studiesprogram evaluationroutinely collected health data

Identifiers

PMID39213024
PMCPMC11399746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.