ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2025
Using a Disentangled Neural Network to Objectively Assess the Outcomes of Midfacial Surgery in Syndromic Craniosynostosis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Use of Machine Learning to Enable Objective Assessment of Surgical Outcomes in Sagittal Craniosynostosis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Identification of Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome Through Swap Disentangled Variational Autoencoder.The Journal of craniofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvancements in artificial intelligence and the development of shape models that quantify normal head shape and facial morphology provide frameworks by which the outcomes of craniofacial surgery can be compared. In this work, the authors demonstrate the use of the swap disentangled variational autoencoder to assess changes after midfacial surgery objectively.
methodsThe model is trained on a data set of 1405 3-dimensional meshes of healthy individuals and syndromic patients, which was augmented using a technique based on spectral interpolation. Patients with a diagnosis of Apert or Crouzon syndrome who had undergone sub- or transcranial midfacial procedures using rigid external distraction had their results interpreted using this model as the point of comparison.
resultsA total of 56 patients met the inclusion criteria: 20 with Apert syndrome and 36 with Crouzon syndrome. By using linear discriminant analysis to project the high-dimensional vectors derived by swap disentangled variational autoencoder onto a 2-dimensional space, the shape properties of Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome can be visualized in relation to the healthy population. In this way, the authors were able to show how surgery elicits global shape changes in each patient. To assess the regional movements achieved during surgery, the authors used a novel metric derived from the Mahalanobis distance to quantify movements through the latent space.
conclusionsObjective outcome evaluation, which encourages in-depth analysis and enhances decision-making, is essential for the progression of surgical practice. The authors demonstrate how artificial intelligence has the ability to improve our understanding of surgery and its effect on craniofacial morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.