Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212893›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2024

Treatment response to durvalumab plus tremelimumab after progression with previous immune checkpoint inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nami Mori, Nobuharu Tamaki, Shintaro Takaki, Keiji Tsuji, Toshifumi Tada, Shinichiro Nakamura, Hironori Ochi, Toshie Mashiba, Masao Doisaki, Hiroyuki Marusawa and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Nami Mori *Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Nobuharu Tamaki *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, 1-26-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo, 180-8610, Japan.
Shintaro TakakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Keiji TsujiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Toshifumi TadaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Japan.
Shinichiro NakamuraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Japan.
Hironori OchiCenter for Liver-Biliary-Pancreatic Disease, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Toshie MashibaCenter for Liver-Biliary-Pancreatic Disease, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Masao DoisakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroyuki MarusawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Haruhiko KobashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Okayama Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Hideki FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Chikara OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan.
Michiko NonogiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokushima Red Cross Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Hirotaka AraiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Maebashi Red Cross Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
Yasushi UchidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Matsue Red Cross Hospital, Matsue, Japan.
Naohito UrawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise, Japan.
Ryoichi NaritaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oita Red Cross Hospital, Oita, Japan.
Takehiro AkahaneDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishinomaki Red Cross Hospital, Ishinomaki, Japan.
Masahiko KondoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Otsu Red Cross Hospital, Otsu, Japan.
Yutaka YasuiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, 1-26-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo, 180-8610, Japan.
Kaoru TsuchiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, 1-26-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo, 180-8610, Japan.
Namiki IzumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, 1-26-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo, 180-8610, Japan.
Masayuki KurosakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, 1-26-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo, 180-8610, Japan. kurosakim@gmail.com.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP24fk0210123, JP24fk0210113, JP24fk0210111, JP24fk0210104, JP24fk0210126Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 23HC2001, 23HC2002, 23HC2003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is unclear whether sequential ICI treatment-durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) after progression on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB)-is effective for HCC. In this nationwide multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the effect of DT treatment based on the timing of treatment. A total of 85 patients receiving DT treatment were enrolled. The primary endpoint is treatment response at week 8 among patients receiving first-line DT treatment, those receiving second-line or later treatment without prior AB therapy, and those receiving second-line or later treatment with prior AB therapy. Objective response rates (ORRs) in patients with first-line treatment, second-line treatment without AB, and second-line treatment with prior AB were 44%, 54%, and 5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, disease control rates (DCRs) were 69%, 91%, and 26%, respectively (p < 0.001). ORR and DCR were significantly lower in patients with prior AB treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) was significantly shortened in patients receiving second-line therapy following prior AB treatment and an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) in those patients for PFS, using first-line therapy as a reference, was 2.35 (1.1-5.1, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the impact of DT sequencing following AB treatment was limited. However, even after second-line treatment, the treatment effect can be equivalent to that of first-line treatment in cases with no history of AB treatment. Thus, prior treatment history should be taken into account when initiating DT treatment.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLiver NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBevacizumabDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabdurvalumabImmune Checkpoint InhibitorstremelimumabAtezolizumab plus bevacizumabDurvalumab plus tremelimumabHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.