SynthesisMolecular diagnosis & therapy2024
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Detection Using CRISPR Technology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current laboratory diagnostics for tuberculosis: from conventional approaches to next-generation molecular and immunological technologies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Cas and Infectious Diseases: A Decade of Translational Advances in Molecular Biotechnology.Biochemical genetics · 2026Review
- Rapid Molecular Diagnostics of Tuberculosis: What Do We Have, What Do We Need?Pulmonary medicine · 2026Review
- From mutation detection to treatment decisions: CRISPR-enabled diagnostics for drug-resistant tuberculosis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Article
- Harnessing the Microbiome: CRISPR-Based Gene Editing and Antimicrobial Peptides in Combating Antibiotic Resistance and Cancer.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Review
- Integration of AI and ML in Tuberculosis (TB) Management: From Diagnosis to Drug Discovery.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid and precise detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is paramount for effective management and control of tuberculosis. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology has emerged as a promising tool for pathogenic diagnosis owing to its specificity and adaptability. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of CRISPR-based techniques in identifying MTB.
methodsA meticulous search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, Embase, and ISI Web of Science to retrieve relevant studies, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data synthesis and analyses, including subgroup analyses, were performed with R v 4.3.1, examining variables like CRISPR variants, gene targets, pre-amplification techniques, and signal readout methods.
resultsFrom 389 identified studies, 14 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 2175 MTB strains. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CRISPR-based techniques were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.99), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 273.4379 (95% CI 103.3311-723.5794), with an area under the curve of 0.97 for the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, denoting excellent diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analyses illustrated variations in diagnostic metrics based on factors like CRISPR variant utilized, target gene, and pre-amplification methods. For instance, CRISPR-Cas12 exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.78-0.98) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93-1), respectively. Moreover, this technology showed a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 100% in detecting resistant MTB.
conclusionCRISPR-based methods exhibit substantial diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for detecting MTB, with notable variances across different CRISPR variants and methodological approaches. Further studies must be conducted to optimize CRISPR's potential as a diagnostic tool for MTB in a variety of clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39212838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.