Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212838›Full record

SynthesisMolecular diagnosis & therapy2024

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Detection Using CRISPR Technology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mohammad Abavisani, Sobhan Karbas Foroushan, Reza Khayami, Amirhossein Sahebkar

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current laboratory diagnostics for tuberculosis: from conventional approaches to next-generation molecular and immunological technologies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad AbavisaniStudent Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sobhan Karbas ForoushanStudent Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Reza KhayamiStudent Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Amirhossein SahebkarCenter for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. amir_Saheb2000@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid and precise detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is paramount for effective management and control of tuberculosis. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology has emerged as a promising tool for pathogenic diagnosis owing to its specificity and adaptability. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of CRISPR-based techniques in identifying MTB.

methodsA meticulous search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, Embase, and ISI Web of Science to retrieve relevant studies, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data synthesis and analyses, including subgroup analyses, were performed with R v 4.3.1, examining variables like CRISPR variants, gene targets, pre-amplification techniques, and signal readout methods.

resultsFrom 389 identified studies, 14 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 2175 MTB strains. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CRISPR-based techniques were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.99), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 273.4379 (95% CI 103.3311-723.5794), with an area under the curve of 0.97 for the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, denoting excellent diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analyses illustrated variations in diagnostic metrics based on factors like CRISPR variant utilized, target gene, and pre-amplification methods. For instance, CRISPR-Cas12 exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.78-0.98) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93-1), respectively. Moreover, this technology showed a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 100% in detecting resistant MTB.

conclusionCRISPR-based methods exhibit substantial diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for detecting MTB, with notable variances across different CRISPR variants and methodological approaches. Further studies must be conducted to optimize CRISPR's potential as a diagnostic tool for MTB in a variety of clinical and research settings.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsMycobacterium tuberculosisSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosisCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID39212838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.