ReviewInternational journal of bipolar disorders2024
Trace lithium levels in drinking water and risk of dementia: a systematic review.
Review in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Manifestations of Lithium Deficiency in the Human Body: What is Known to Date (A Narrative Review).Biological trace element research · 2026Review
- Blood metal signatures and their association with Alzheimer's disease risk and cognitive decline in an Egyptian cohort.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Multiyear Soil-Fruit Transfer Dynamics of Macro- and Trace Elements in Raspberry (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lithium and the Brain-Bone Axis: A Bridge between Osteoporosis and Alzheimer's Disease.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Does Lithium Lower the Risk of Glaucoma-A Danish Nationwide Study.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- [Lithium treatment and reduction of suicide risk: evidence and clinical significance].Der Nervenarzt · 2025Review
- Article
- An Overview of the Effects of Lithium on Alzheimer's Disease: A Historical Perspective.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince its debut in 1949, lithium (Li) has been regarded as a gold standard therapy for mood stabilization. Neuroprotective effects of Li have been replicated across many different paradigms ranging from tissue cultures to human studies. This has generated interest in potentially repurposing this drug. However, the optimal dosage required for neuroprotective effects remains unclear and may be different than the doses needed for treatment of bipolar disorders. Recent studies on trace-Li levels in the water suggest that Li, could slow cognitive decline and prevent dementia with long-term use even at very low doses. The current review aims to synthesize the data on the topic and challenge the conventional high-dose paradigm.
resultsWe systematically reviewed five available studies, which reported associations between trace-Li in water and incidence or mortality from dementia. Association between trace-Li levels and a lower risk or mortality from dementia were observed at concentrations of Li in drinking water as low as 0.002 mg/L and 0.056 mg/L. Meanwhile, levels below 0.002 mg/L did not elicit this effect. Although three of the five studies found dementia protective properties of Li in both sexes, a single study including lower Li levels (0.002 mg/l) found such association only in women.
conclusionThe reviewed evidence shows that trace-Li levels in the water are sufficient to lower the incidence or mortality from dementia. Considering the lack of options for the prevention or treatment of dementia, we should not ignore these findings. Future trials of Li should focus on long term use of low or even micro doses of Li in the prevention or treatment of dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.