Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212753›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Effect of different tube feeding methods on gastroesophageal reflux features in preterm infants: a pH-impedance monitoring study.

Silvia Martini, Fabio Meneghin, Arianna Aceti, Nadia Cerchierini, Isadora Beghetti, Gianluca Lista, Luigi Corvaglia

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Gastroesophageal reflux during postpyloric versus gastric tube feeding in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvia Martini *Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Fabio Meneghin *Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, "V. Buzzi" Children's Hospital, ASST FBF-Sacco-Buzzi, Milan, Italy.
Arianna AcetiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Nadia CerchieriniNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS AOUBO, Bologna, Italy.
Isadora BeghettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. isadora.beghetti@unibo.it.
Gianluca Lista *Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, "V. Buzzi" Children's Hospital, ASST FBF-Sacco-Buzzi, Milan, Italy.
Luigi Corvaglia *Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A stepwise approach is currently considered the best choice to manage gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in preterm infants. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different tube feeding techniques on GER frequency and features in symptomatic tube-fed preterm neonates. Tube-fed infants < 34 weeks' gestation were eligible for this prospective, bicentric, cross-over study if, due to GER symptoms, they underwent a diagnostic 24-h combined pH and multiple intraluminal impedance (pH-MII) monitoring. During the monitoring period, each infant received the same feeding cycle, repeated twice: continuous tube feeding, bolus feeding followed by tube feeding permanence and by tube feeding removal. The impact of these three feeding modalities on pH-MII GER features was assessed. Thirty-one infants were enrolled. Despite a low number of reflux episodes, a significant decrease in total GERs (P < 0.001), in GERs detected by pH monitoring (P < 0.001), and in both acid and non-acid GERs detected by MII (P < 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively) was observed in association with continuous feeding compared to bolus feeds, followed or not by tube feeding removal. Compared to continuous feeding, both bolus feeding modalities were associated with a significantly higher number of proximal GERs (P < 0.001). No difference in any pH-MII parameter was observed in relation to tube feeding persistence after bolus feeding administration.

conclusionsContinuous feeding and boluses may have a different impact on pH-MII GER features in symptomatic tube-fed preterm infants, whereas the permanence of the feeding tube across LES did not seem to worsen GER indexes. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Due to the functional and anatomical immaturity of the gastrointestinal tract, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is common in preterm infants. • A stepwise therapeutical approach which firstly undertakes conservative strategies is the most advisable choice to avoid potentially harmful pharmacological overtreatments in the preterm population. WHAT IS NEW: • Continuous feeding and boluses may have a different impact on GER features assessed by pH-MII monitoring in tube-fed preterm infants. • The permanence of the feeding tube during or after the feeding period did not seem to worsen GER occurrence. • By reducing GER features, especially acid GER, continuous feeding may potentially contribute to limit the need for antiacid medications in this population.

Indexed as

Cross-Over StudiesElectric ImpedanceEnteral NutritionEsophageal pH MonitoringGastroesophageal RefluxInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInfant, NewbornMaleProspective StudiesBolus tube feedingContinuous tube feedingGastroesophageal refluxPH and multiple intraluminal impedance monitoringPreterm infants

Identifiers

PMID39212753
PMCPMC11473593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.