Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212726›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2025

Vocalization-induced middle ear muscle reflex and auditory fovea do not contribute to the unimpaired auditory sensitivity after intense noise exposure in the CF-FM bat, Hipposideros pratti.

Zhongdan Cui, Jianwen Zou, Yuting Zhou, Yuntu Cao, Haonan Song, Haoyue Xu, Jing Wu, Baoling Jin, Lijian Yang, Ya Jia and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhongdan CuiHubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Jianwen ZouHubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Yuting ZhouHubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Yuntu CaoHubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Haonan SongHubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Haoyue XuHubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Jing WuHubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Baoling JinHubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Lijian YangCollege of Physical Science and Technology, Central China Normal University, Hubei, 430079, Wuhan, China.
Ya JiaCollege of Physical Science and Technology, Central China Normal University, Hubei, 430079, Wuhan, China.
Qicai ChenHubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Ziying FuHubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China. ccnufuzy@ccnu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270534self-determined research funds of CCNU from the colleges' basic research and operation of MOE CCNU22JC009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behaviors and auditory physiological responses of some species of echolocating bats remain unaffected after exposure to intense noise, but information on the underlying mechanisms remains limited. Here, we studied whether the vocalization-induced middle ear muscle (MEM) contractions (MEM reflex) and auditory fovea contributed to the unimpaired auditory sensitivity of constant frequency-frequency modulation (CF-FM) bats after exposure to broad-band intense noise. The vocalizations of the CF-FM bat, Hipposideros pratti, were inhibited through anesthesia to eliminate the vocalization-induced MEM reflex. First, the anesthetized bats were exposed to intense broad-band noise, and the findings showed that the bats could still maintain their auditory sensitivities. However, auditory sensitivities were seriously impaired in CBA/Ca mice exposed to intense noise under anesthesia. This indicated that the unimpaired auditory sensitivity in H. pratti after exposure to intense noise under anesthesia was not due to anesthetization. The bats were further exposed to low-frequency band-limited noise, whose passband did not overlap with echolocation call frequencies. The results showed that the auditory responses to sound frequencies within the noise spectrum and one-half octave higher than the spectrum were also unimpaired. Taken together, the results indicate that both vocalization-induced MEM reflex and auditory fovea do not contribute to the unimpaired auditory sensitivity in H. pratti after exposure to intense noise. The possible mechanisms underlying the unimpaired auditory sensitivity after echolocating bats were exposed to intense noise are discussed.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionChiropteraEar, MiddleNoiseReflexVocalization, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory ThresholdEcholocationMaleMiceMice, Inbred CBAAuditory foveaEcholocationHearing lossMiddle ear muscleNoise susceptibility

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.