Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212704›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Impact of the in-office surgical activity on the classical phonomicrosurgical interventions in a laryngology referral center.

Ralph Haddad, Alexia Mattei, William Blanc, Justin Michel, Antoine Giovanni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ralph HaddadDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, AP-HM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 147 Boulevard Baille, Marseille CEDEX 5, 13385, France. ralph.haddad@ap-hm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1388-3848
Alexia MatteiDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, AP-HM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 147 Boulevard Baille, Marseille CEDEX 5, 13385, France.
William BlancDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, AP-HM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 147 Boulevard Baille, Marseille CEDEX 5, 13385, France.
Justin MichelDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, AP-HM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 147 Boulevard Baille, Marseille CEDEX 5, 13385, France.
Antoine GiovanniDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, AP-HM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 147 Boulevard Baille, Marseille CEDEX 5, 13385, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Office-based laryngology procedures evolved in the recent years with all the technology advances and have gained popularity among laryngologists. The indications enlarged, making it a valid surgical option for almost all voice disorders. This emerging technique raise the question of the place left for traditional phonosurgeries in the operating room under general anesthesia. We reviewed our surgical activity in our laryngology referral center from 2018 to 2023. Since we started the in-office procedures in 2018, the number of these interventions significantly increased, accompanying a significant increase in our total surgical activity. We noted no significant decrease in the number of interventions done in the operating room, which made us consider the office-based procedures as a complimentary and not a competitive option for traditional surgeries, helping us increase our total number of interventions, and thus offer patients more opportunities for a quicker medical care. Our register review showed also a change of treatment trends for unilateral vocal fold paralysis, with office-based interventions becoming the first-line treatment.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresMicrosurgeryHumansOtolaryngologyRetrospective StudiesVocal Cord ParalysisVoice DisordersLaryngologyMicrophonosurgeryOffice-based interventions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.