ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Short segment linear "flaps" of the abdominal aorta: proposed mechanism of origin and evaluation of natural history via retrospective imaging review.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLuminal linear findings (LLF) of the abdominal aorta are often called aortic "flaps," triggering concern for acute aortic syndrome. However, these "flaps" are unlikely to represent intimomedial dissection given isolation to the abdominal aorta, short length, and incidental discovery. We aim to characterize the etiology and stability of LLF.
methodsCT reports finalized January 2021-December 2022 were queried for terms "focal dissection," "dissection flap," "linear filling defect," and "linear flap." Patients were excluded for thoracoabdominal dissection, LLF in non-aortic vessel, no prior contrast-enhanced imaging, and less than 6 months between exams. Index exam reviewed for presence of LLF, atherosclerosis, and aortic caliber at LLF site. Prior exam assessed for aortic caliber and aortic findings at subsequent LLF site. Patients with unchanged LLF between exams were categorized "Stable" and patients with interval change "Dynamic."
resultsSeven hundred and two cases identified. After exclusions, imaging from 70 patients reviewed; 1 excluded for no LLF. Stable Cohort of 39 patients had median follow-up 31 months (range 6-284 months). 87% of aortas were moderately/severely atherosclerotic (n = 16 moderate, n = 18 severe), while 69% were ectatic/aneurysmal (n = 27). Dynamic Cohort of 20 patients had median follow-up of 70 months (range 14-244 months). All were atherosclerotic and 80% were ectatic/aneurysmal compared to 25% ectatic/aneurysmal at prior imaging. Mural thrombus was present at the site of the future LLF in 17 of 20, thrombosed PAU in 1, and no focal findings in 2.
conclusionShort-segment LLFs within the abdominal aorta arise from prior mural thrombus and demonstrate long term stability. Clinically and radiographically indolent, LLFs should not be called dissection flaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39212684What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.