Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212668›Full record

ArticleHerz2024

[eHealth: digital bridges in the healthcare system].

Simon Glück, Christian Perings

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Herz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon GlückDas Dienstleistungsunternehmen des Bundesverbandes Niedergelassener Kardiologen e. V., BNK Service GmbH, Brabanter Straße 4, 80805, München, Deutschland. simon.glueck@bnk-service.de.
Christian PeringsKLW Paulus GmbH Klinikum Lünen, Lünen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare in Germany is divided into various service sectors, which differ in terms of outpatient and inpatient care as well as the legal and financial bases. The resulting breaks in consecutive patient care are to be overcome by integrating services into cross-sectoral processes (integrated care). Digitalization and the associated use of information and communication technology (ICT) play a decisive role in this. To derive implications and benefits it is necessary to classify the technical possibilities. For this purpose, eHealth is the basic generic term for all process support and direct patient applications that are based on the electronic exchange of data. A distinction can be made between technology for process support and technology for direct application on the patient. Applications in all categories are suitable for ensuring that interfaces in the flow of information between those involved in healthcare processes are adequately managed by eHealth. Furthermore, the allocation of specialized medicine through eHealth is independent of location and sector. New possibilities for generating and using structured data for evidence development and care research are realized through eHealth and the development of existing and new care models will be promoted.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareTelemedicineDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedElectronic Health RecordsGermanyHumansModels, OrganizationalDigitalizationHealthcare interfacesInformation and communication technologyIntegrated careIntersectoral care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.