Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212660›Full record

ArticleJournal of economic entomology2024

Effect of temperature and humidity on insect DNA integrity evaluated by real-time PCR.

Elizabeth V Fowler, Melissa L Starkie, Mark J Blacket, David G Mayer, Mark K Schutze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of economic entomology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth V FowlerDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Biosecurity Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-9885
Melissa L StarkieDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Biosecurity Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mark J BlacketAgriculture Victoria Research, Invertebrate & Weed Sciences, AgriBio Centre, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7864-5712
David G MayerDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Agri-Science Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-9176
Mark K SchutzeDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Biosecurity Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

Australian Blueberry Growers' AssociationAustralian Federal Government (Department of Agriculture, Water and Environment)Department of Energy, Environment and Climate ActionDepartment of Natural Resources and EnvironmentDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional DevelopmentDepartment of Primary Industries and RegionsDepartment of Tourism, Industry and TradeGreenSkin AvocadosHort Innovation's Hort FrontiersJames Cook UniversityQueensland University of TechnologyStrengthening Australia's Fruit Fly System Research Program 4-EKAOPM2Western Sydney University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects collected in dry traps can degrade rapidly, especially in warm, humid environments where many biodiversity and biosecurity surveillance activities are undertaken. Degradation can severely impact diagnostics, as trap catches can become difficult to identify to species level using morphological characters or, of increasing importance, molecular approaches. This is especially problematic for biosecurity surveillance of exotic tephritid fruit flies, where diagnostics are heavily reliant on morphological characters. We tested the effects of differing temperature and humidity conditions on mock samples of tephritid fruit flies in a controlled environment and compared our results to field trap catches. DNA degradation was quantified using real-time PCR assays, including one assay newly developed and tested here. We observed a correlation between increasing DNA degradation and increasing temperature and humidity. The greatest DNA degradation occurred under combined high humidity (90% relative humidity) and constant high temperature (35 °C). Unexpectedly, fluctuating temperature did not have a significant impact on DNA. Other factors, such as trap design, time in the field, and rainfall, did not significantly correlate with DNA quality across the field samples tested. When plotted against mock samples, field samples clustered together, with no clear pattern or predictability regarding the quantity of DNA preserved, indicating other untested environmental variables may be at play. Predictably, increased exposure time was found to have a detrimental effect on DNA quality for all treatments. These findings will improve the delivery of surveillance activities through the implementation of shorter trap clearance timeframes and improved trap designs and procedures.

Indexed as

HumidityReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTemperatureAnimalsDNATephritidaeDNAbiosecurityDNA preservationgBlockTephritidae

Identifiers

PMID39212660
PMCPMC11473036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.