ArticleAnnals of botany2024
The highly dynamic satellitomes of cultivated wheat species.
Article in Annals of botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterologous expression of DobHLH25 from Dendrobium officinale enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Detailed re-analysis of satellitome mapping facilitated by the telomere-to-telomere (T2T) assembly of bread wheat genome.Plant molecular biology · 2026Article
- Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsDurum wheat, Triticum turgidum, and bread wheat, Triticum aestivum, are two allopolyploid species of very recent origin that have been subjected to intense selection programmes during the thousands of years they have been cultivated. In this paper, we study the durum wheat satellitome and establish a comparative analysis with the previously published bread wheat satellitome.
methodsWe revealed the durum wheat satellitome using the satMiner protocol, which is based on consecutive rounds of clustering of Illumina reads by RepeatExplorer2, and we estimated abundance and variation for each identified satellite DNA (satDNA) with RepeatMasker v4.0.5. We also performed a deep satDNA family characterization including chromosomal location by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in durum wheat and its comparison with FISH patterns in bread wheat. BLAST was used for trailing each satDNA in the assembly of durum wheat genome through NCBI's Genome Data Viewer and the genome assemblies of both species were compared. Sequence divergence and consensus turnover rate between homologous satDNA families of durum and bread wheat were estimated using MEGA11. KEY
resultsThis study reveals that in an exceedingly short period, significant qualitative and quantitative changes have occurred in the set of satDNAs of both species, with expansions/contractions of the number of repeats and the loci per satellite, different in each species, and a high rate of sequence change for most of these satellites, in addition to the emergence/loss of satDNAs not shared between the two species analysed. These evolutionary changes in satDNA are common between species but what is truly remarkable and novel is that these processes have taken place in less than the last ~8000 years separating the two species, indicating an accelerated evolution of their satDNAs.
conclusionsThese results, together with the relationship of many of these satellites with transposable elements and the polymorphisms they generate at the level of centromeres and subtelomeric regions of their chromosomes, are analysed and discussed in the context of the evolutionary origin of these species and the selection pressure exerted by humans throughout the history of their cultivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.