Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212325›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology2025

cIMPACT-NOW update 8: Clarifications on molecular risk parameters and recommendations for WHO grading of meningiomas.

Felix Sahm, Kenneth D Aldape, Priscilla K Brastianos, Daniel J Brat, Sonika Dahiya, Andreas von Deimling, Caterina Giannini, Mark R Gilbert, David N Louis, David R Raleigh and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. "Updates on diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers of CNS tumors".Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Felix SahmCCU Neuropathology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5441-1962
Kenneth D AldapeLaboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Priscilla K BrastianosDivisions of Hematology/Oncology and Neuro-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4470-8425
Daniel J BratDepartment of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sonika DahiyaDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-0964
Andreas von DeimlingORCID 0000-0002-5863-540X
Caterina GianniniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2757-6782
Mark R GilbertNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
David N LouisDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
David R RaleighDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Neurological Surgery, and Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Guido ReifenbergerGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sandro SantagataDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Chitra SarkarDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Gelareh ZadehDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6637-4502
Pieter WesselingPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Arie PerryDepartments of Pathology and Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

Understanding druggable drivers of meningioma tumorigenesisR01CA262311 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RALEIGH, DAVID R · 2021 to 2025
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas are the most frequent primary intracranial tumors. Hence, they constitute a major share of diagnostic specimens in neuropathology practice. The 2021 WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors ("CNS5") has introduced the first molecular grading parameters for meningioma with oncogenic variants in the TERT promoter and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B as markers for CNS WHO grade 3. However, after the publication of the new classification volume, clarifications were requested, not only on novel but also on long-standing questions in meningioma grading that were beyond the scope of the WHO "blue book." In addition, more recent research into possible new molecular grading parameters could not yet be implemented in the 2021 classification but constitutes a compelling body of literature. Hence, the consortium to inform molecular and practical approaches to CNS tumor taxonomy-not official WHO (cIMPACT-NOW) Steering Committee convened a working group to provide such clarification and assess the evidence of possible novel molecular criteria. As a result, this cIMPACT-NOW update provides guidance for more standardized morphological evaluation and interpretation, most prominently pertaining to brain invasion, identifies scenarios in which advanced molecular testing is recommended, proposes to assign CNS WHO grade 2 for cases with CNS WHO grade 1 morphology but chromosomal arm 1p deletion in combination with 22q deletion and/or NF2 oncogenic variants, and discusses areas in which the current evidence is not yet sufficient to result in new recommendations.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaPractice Guidelines as TopicHumansNeoplasm GradingWorld Health OrganizationBiomarkers, TumorcIMPACT-NOWclassificationgradingmeningiomamolecular neuropathologyWHO classification

Identifiers

PMID39212325
PMCPMC11812049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.