Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212277›Full record

ArticleJournal of water and health2024

Prediction of geogenic source of groundwater fluoride contamination in Indian states: A comparative study of different supervised machine learning algorithms.

Garima Singh, Shikha Mehta

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of water and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Garima SinghJIIT, Noida, India E-mail: singh.garima529@gmail.com.
Shikha MehtaJIIT, Noida, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India has been dealing with fluoride contamination of groundwater for the past few decades. Long-term exposure of fluoride can cause skeletal and dental fluorosis. Therefore, an in-depth exploration of fluoride concentrations in different parts of India is desirable. This work employs machine learning algorithms to analyze the fluoride concentrations in five major affected Indian states (Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and West Bengal). A correlation matrix was used to identify appropriate predictor variables for fluoride prediction. The various algorithms used for predictions included K-nearest neighbor (KNN), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector classifier (SVC), Gaussian NB, MLP classifier, decision tree classifier, gradient boosting classifier, voting classifier soft and voting classifier hard. The performance of these models is assessed over accuracy, precision, recall and error rate and receiver operating curve. As the dataset was skewed, the performance of models was evaluated before and after resampling. Analysis of results indicates that the RF model is the best model for predicting fluoride contamination in groundwater in Indian states.

Indexed as

FluoridesGroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAlgorithmsEnvironmental MonitoringIndiaSupervised Machine LearningFluoridesWater Pollutants, Chemicalfluoride contaminationgroundwaterhydrogeochemistrysupervised machine learning techniques

Identifiers

PMID39212277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.