ArticleJournal of water and health2024
Prediction of geogenic source of groundwater fluoride contamination in Indian states: A comparative study of different supervised machine learning algorithms.
Article in Journal of water and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
India has been dealing with fluoride contamination of groundwater for the past few decades. Long-term exposure of fluoride can cause skeletal and dental fluorosis. Therefore, an in-depth exploration of fluoride concentrations in different parts of India is desirable. This work employs machine learning algorithms to analyze the fluoride concentrations in five major affected Indian states (Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and West Bengal). A correlation matrix was used to identify appropriate predictor variables for fluoride prediction. The various algorithms used for predictions included K-nearest neighbor (KNN), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector classifier (SVC), Gaussian NB, MLP classifier, decision tree classifier, gradient boosting classifier, voting classifier soft and voting classifier hard. The performance of these models is assessed over accuracy, precision, recall and error rate and receiver operating curve. As the dataset was skewed, the performance of models was evaluated before and after resampling. Analysis of results indicates that the RF model is the best model for predicting fluoride contamination in groundwater in Indian states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39212277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.