Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39212182›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2024

Transitional discharge interventions for people with schizophrenia.

Pablo Roson Rodriguez, Xiao Chen, Marcelo Arancibia, Luis Garegnani, Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay, Husam Aldeen Mohammad, Juan Va Franco

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07713849 (Adapting and Improving Transition Care for First Episode Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07713849 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Adapting and Improving Transition Care for First Episode Psychosis

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of ChicagoRan2026 to 2029Enrolled75ConditionsSchizoaffective Disorders, Bipolar Disorder With Psychotic Features, Schizophrenia Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder With Psychotic FeaturesArmsTransition Care Team
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Transitional discharge interventions for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pablo Roson RodriguezResearch Department, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Xiao ChenMinerva University, San Francisco, California, USA.
Marcelo ArancibiaCenter for Translational Studies in Stress and Mental Health (C-ESTRES), Department of Psychiatry, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Luis GaregnaniResearch Department, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Camila Micaela Escobar LiquitayResearch Department, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Husam Aldeen MohammadDepartment of Psychiatry, Al-Mowasat Hospital, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Juan Va FrancoInstitute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchizophrenia is a chronic mental illness characterized by delusions, hallucinations, and important functional and social disability. Interventions labeled as 'transitional' add to care plans made during the hospital stay in preparation for discharge. They also include interventions developed after discharge to support people with serious mental illness as they make the transition from the hospital to the community. Transitional discharge interventions may anticipate the future needs of the patient after discharge by co-ordinating the different levels of the health system that can effectively guarantee continuity of care in the community. This occurs through the provision of therapeutic relationships which give a safety net throughout the discharge and community reintegration processes to improve the general condition of users, level of functioning, use of health resources, and satisfaction with care.

objectivesTo assess the effects of transitional discharge interventions for people with schizophrenia. SEARCH

methodsOn 7 December 2022, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials, which is based on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN, PsycINFO, and WHO ICTRP. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of transitional discharge interventions in people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-related disorders. Eligible interventions included three key elements: predischarge planning, co-ordination of care and follow-up, and postdischarge support. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Outcomes of this review included global state (relapse), service use (hospitalization), general functioning, satisfaction with care, adverse effects/events, quality of life, and direct costs. For binary outcomes, we calculated risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes, we calculated the mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% CIs. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence. MAIN

resultsWe found 12 studies with 1748 participants comparing transitional discharge interventions to usual care. All were parallel-group RCTs. No studies assessed global state (relapse) or reported data about adverse events/effects. All studies had a high risk of bias, mainly due to serious concerns about allocation concealment, deviations from intended interventions, measurement of the outcomes, and missing outcome data. Transitional discharge interventions may make little to no difference in service use (hospitalization) at short- and long-term follow-ups, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.50; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is currently no clear evidence for or against implementing transitional discharge interventions for people with schizophrenia. Transitional discharge interventions may improve patient satisfaction and functionality, but this evidence is also very uncertain. For future research, it is important to improve the quality of the conduct and reporting of these trials, including using validated tools for measuring their outcomes.

Indexed as

Patient DischargeSchizophreniaBiasContinuity of Patient CareHumansPatient ReadmissionPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTransitional Care

Identifiers

PMID39212182
PMCPMC11363221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.