ArticleBiology open2024
A novel technique for atraumatic transurethral catheterisation of male rats.
Article in Biology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role and mechanism of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures in the repair of urethral injury in rats.Molecular medicine reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transurethral catheterisation of male rats is technically difficult owing to anatomical peculiarities. In the male rat, the urethral striated sphincter consists of two lateral fascicles separated by an anterior and a posterior strip of connective tissue, which impedes the smooth insertion of a urinary catheter. For rat studies requiring continuous collection of urine, bladder irrigation, or measurement of bladder pressure, investigators either have to exclude the male population (be limited to the female population) or perform percutaneous (suprapubic) bladder puncture in male rats, which is more traumatic and invasive than transurethral catheterisation. This paper describes a novel, atraumatic method of transurethral catheterisation in the male rat, with the aid of a microscope and microsurgical instruments. Six Wistar rats were used for this experiment, all of which were catheterised successfully, with no evidence of bladder or urethral injury. The study shows that male rats can be safely catheterised via the urethra with the aid of a microscope and microsurgical instruments for both visual and tactile feedback. This is a relatively straightforward technique to learn and can allow for inclusion of male rats in future studies requiring urinary analysis or bladder irrigation, without the need for traumatic percutaneous (suprapubic) bladder puncture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.