Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211980›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2024

Older Adults in Administrative Quagmire: A Scoping Review of Policy and Program Coordination Across Six Marginalized Older Adult Populations.

Patrik Marier, Meghan Joy, Sandra Smele, Rym Zakaria, Julie Beauchamp, Valérie Bourgeois-Guérin, Pierre-Luc Lupien, Tamara Sussman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patrik MarierDepartment of Political Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4551-6716
Meghan JoyDepartment of Political Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Sandra SmeleCentre for Research and Expertise in Social Gerontology, Côte St-Luc, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1995-6307
Rym ZakariaCentre for Research and Expertise in Social Gerontology, Côte St-Luc, Québec, Canada.
Julie BeauchampDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, Québec, Canada.
Valérie Bourgeois-GuérinDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Pierre-Luc LupienDepartment of Sociology, Cégep de la Gaspésie et des Îles, Gaspé, Québec, Canada.
Tamara SussmanSchool of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1226-6450

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture 2021-OVTR-295231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCoordination of governmental action is crowded with policies and programs that are highly interdependent, sometimes operating in silos if not contradicting each other. These dilemmas, or administrative quagmires, are heightened for older adults in general, but they are particularly problematic for marginalized older adults because these groups often require public assistance and support. This scoping review studies the coordination of governmental action on aging published in social science journals, focusing on 6 groups of marginalized older adults: those with histories of immigration, individuals with severe mental health problems, those who have had experiences of homelessness, formerly incarcerated individuals, members of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) community, and individuals living in a rural area. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA 5-stage scoping review methodology was followed, and 53 articles (published between 2000 and 2022) from 5 social science databases were analyzed.

resultsThe analysis revealed a limited number of contributions with coordination as a primary focus. Understandings of coordination varied but tended to examine structure, organization, and relationships between sectors. When coordination was the primary object of a study, it was often analyzed in 1 specific policy area or within a clinical setting along the lines of facilitating care coordination. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This scoping review reveals a mutual neglect on the part of public administration and policy scholars toward marginalized older adults and a lack of public administration considerations on the part of scholars studying long-term care and social service programs for these marginalized older adults.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsAgedFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMaleSexual and Gender MinoritiesSocial MarginalizationCoordinationGovernmentHealth and social servicesMarginalizationPublic policy

Identifiers

PMID39211980
PMCPMC11535365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.