ArticleHeliyon2024
Studying the effectiveness of self-directed education in learning and teaching the otolaryngology module in an integrated-based curriculum.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of three-dimensional knowledge target teaching combined with immersive clinical experience in otology teaching practice.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Integrating O-AMAS and Problem-Based Learning in Otolaryngology Education: A Self-Controlled Trial of a Novel Active Learning Framework.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Self-learning is a learning process in which students harvest the enterprise, to express their learning goals, choose assets for learning, practice learning strategies, and assess the outcomes achieved. Many forms of self-learning were introduced in integrative medical curricula such as Team-based learning (TBL) and Problem-based learning (PBL). This study aims to evaluate self-learning in the otolaryngology module and determine the type of self-learning that students prefer and which of these types has a stronger impact on achieving the educational objectives of the module. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was done on the 270 students of studied the otolaryngology module in three consecutive years representing the whole class of the fifth-year medical students along three consecutive years. A Likert scale questionnaire was distributed to measure the students' satisfaction with the current teaching and learning. Results: The obtained results revealed higher students 'satisfaction with TBL than other modalities supported by high achievement in TBL-related questions. In addition, there is a significant difference between TBL and PBL ( Conclusion: The results showed that the highest students' satisfaction was towards TBL compared to other educational methods. These results encourage clinical educators to insert and implement TBL in most of the integrative curriculum modules, especially that of the clinical years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.