Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211930›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Preparation and optimization of niosome encapsulated meropenem for significant antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity against methicillin-resistant

Kamal Paseban, Sama Noroozi, Rokhshad Gharehcheloo, Abbas Haddadian, Farnoush Falahi Robattorki, Hedieh Dibah, Reza Amani, Fatima Sabouri, Erfan Ghanbarzadeh, Shadi Hajrasouiha and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Optimization andAnti-inflammatory & anti-allergy agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  10. MAPLE-prepared graphene oxide-based coatings for improved orthopedic screws used in knee interventions.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Kamal PasebanDepartment of Biology, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran.
Sama NorooziDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah, Utah, USA.
Rokhshad GharehchelooDepartment of Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Branch, Islamic Azad Universty, Tehran, Iran.
Abbas HaddadianDepartment of Biology, East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Farnoush Falahi RobattorkiBiomedical Engineering Group, Chemical Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Hedieh DibahDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Reza AmaniBiotechnology Research Center, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran.
Fatima SabouriInternational Acedemy of Georgia, Georgia.
Erfan GhanbarzadehDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Shadi HajrasouihaDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Arezou AzariDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Tina RashidianDepartment of Biology, Parand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Parand, Iran.
Amir MirzaieDepartment of Biology, Parand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Parand, Iran.
Zahra PirdolatDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Massoumeh SalarkiaDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Dorsa Sadat ShahravaDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Fatemeh SafaeinikjooDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Atena SeifiDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Niusha Sadat HosseiniDepartment of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Niloofar SaeiniaDepartment of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Aliasghar Bagheri KashtaliDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Ali AhmadiyanDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Roza Mazid AbadiDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Faezeh Sadat KermaniDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Romina AndalibiDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Arman ChitgarzadehDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Aryan Aryan TavanaDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Tohid Piri GharaghieDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: One of the targeted drug delivery systems is the use of nanocarriers, and one of these drug delivery systems is niosome. Niosome have a nano-vesicular structure and are composed of non-ionic surfactants. Objective: In this study, various niosome-encapsulated meropenem formulations were prepared. Subsequently, their antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities were evaluated against methicillin-resistant Methods: The physicochemical properties of niosomal formulations were characterized using a field scanning electron microscope, X-Ray diffraction, Zeta potential, and dynamic light scattering. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities were evaluated using broth microdilution and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration, respectively. In addition, biofilm gene expression analysis was performed using quantitative Real-Time PCR. To evaluate biocompatibility, the cytotoxicity of niosome-encapsulated meropenem in a normal human diploid fibroblast (HDF) cell line was investigated using an MTT assay. Results: An F1 formulation of niosome-encapsulated meropenem with a size of 51.3 ± 5.84 nm and an encapsulation efficiency of 84.86 ± 3.14 % was achieved. The synthesized niosomes prevented biofilm capacity with a biofilm growth inhibition index of 69 % and significantly downregulated

Indexed as

AntibacterialAnti-biofilmMeropenemNiosomeStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID39211930
PMCPMC11357772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.