Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211919›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Optimization and comparison of unidirectional lidocaine-loaded buccal patch with the articaine-loaded buccal patch to reduce injection pain and increment of patients' compliance in dental procedures: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Elham Panahandeh, Erfaneh Ghassami, Milad Etemadi Sh, Jaleh Varshosaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elham PanahandehDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy and Novel Drug Delivery Systems Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, 81746-73461, Iran.
Erfaneh GhassamiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy and Novel Drug Delivery Systems Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, 81746-73461, Iran.
Milad Etemadi ShDental Implants Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Jaleh VarshosazDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy and Novel Drug Delivery Systems Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, 81746-73461, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nervous patients often postpone dental visits until they are in severe pain, exacerbating anxiety. Buccal patches provide a noninvasive method of delivering drugs between the upper gum and cheek, offering local and systemic effects. Prior research has demonstrated the effectiveness, safety, and reliability of topical lidocaine or articaine patches for oral anesthesia. Consequently, this study aimed to develop a three-layered buccal drug delivery system for topical anesthetics. Methods: The first step was preparing and optimizing lidocaine-loaded three-layer patches using Design-expert software. The effects of ethylcellulose, Eudragit, and carbopol concentrations were investigated on patch characteristics, including mucoadhesion, Young's modulus, and Elongation-at-break. Subsequently, patches were fabricated according to the optimized formulation determined by the software, and their efficacy was studied in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Participants received either lidocaine or articaine-loaded compared with placebo in a split-mouth study. They evaluated their pain levels using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the onset and duration of action were recorded for each treatment. Results: According to the results, increasing ethyl cellulose and Eudragit concentrations improved mucoadhesion force (p < 0.05) while increasing ethyl cellulose and reducing Eudragit concentrations increased Young's modulus (p < 0.05). Increasing Carbopol and decreasing Eudragit concentrations also raised elongation at break significantly in the patch (p < 0.05). Treatment with lidocaine-loaded patches resulted in lower VAS scores and faster onset of action in patients than articaine-loaded patches. However, the duration of the effect was longer in the former(p < 0.001). Conclusion: Based on the responses' analysis, the formulation of the 3-layered buccal patch was optimized. This formulation comprised 4.72 % ethyl cellulose, 2 % Carbopol, and 5 % eudragit. Clinical evaluation results showed that loading the optimized formulation with lidocaine was more efficient in controlling the injection pain than articaine. Trial registration: This trial was prospectively registered with irct.behdasht.gov.ir (registration number: IRCT20210118050067N2) on Aug 19, 2022.

Indexed as

ArticaineBuccal drug delivery systemClinical trialLidocaineMucoadhesive buccal patchesSplit mouth trialTopical anesthesiaUnidirectional patch

Identifiers

PMID39211919
PMCPMC11357764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.