Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211911›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2024

Self-Rated Health Status and the Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study of Middle-Aged and Older Chinese.

Lin Wu, Ruyi Chen, Aiping Sheng, Hongqiang Lou, Xiaowen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lin WuSchool of Medicine, Jinhua University of Vocational Technology, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Ruyi ChenSchool of Medicine, Jinhua University of Vocational Technology, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Aiping ShengSchool of Medicine, Jinhua University of Vocational Technology, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Hongqiang LouSchool of Medicine, Jinhua University of Vocational Technology, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaowen WangPublic Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence on the relationship between self-rated health status and incident type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in China is scarce. This study aims to examine the prospective association of self-rated health status with the subsequent risk of T2DM among middle-aged and older Chinese subjects. Methods: Data were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study of 9844 Chinese individuals aged 45 years or older. Cox proportional hazards models were used to yield hazard ratios (HRs) relating self-rated health status to the 7-year incidence of T2DM, adjusting for conventional risk factors. Results: Compared to those with very good or good self-rated health, individuals with poor health had a significantly higher risk of developing T2DM in the multivariable-adjusted model [HR = 1.36 (1.07, 1.73)]. Subgroup analysis by sex showed stronger associations in women [HR = 1.53 (1.11, 2.12)]. Interaction analyses indicated that factors such as age, sex, obesity, smoking status, drinking status, history of hypertension and history of dyslipidemia did not modify the association (all Conclusion: Poor self-rated health status is associated with a higher risk of developing T2DM in middle-aged and older Chinese people.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Health StatusAgedChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSelf ReportSex FactorsChinesecohortprospective studyself-rated health statustype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39211911
PMCPMC11357931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.