ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Standardized clinical data capture to describe cerebral palsy.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe a standardized methodology for capturing clinically valuable information on young people with cerebral palsy (CP) from caregivers and clinicians during routine clinical care. Methods: We developed a caregiver-facing intake form and clinician-facing standardized note template and integrated both into routine clinical care at a tertiary care CP center ( https://bit.ly/CP-Intake-Methodology ). We extracted this caregiver and clinician-entered data on people with an ICD10 diagnosis of CP seen between 3/22/23 and 12/28/23. We used this data to describe how CP manifests in this group and which medical features affected the odds of walking, oral feeding, and speech by age 5. Results: Of 686 visits, 663 (97%) had caregiver- and clinician-entered data and 633 had a clinician-confirmed CP diagnosis (mean age 9.1, 53.4% Male, 78.5% White). It was common to have quadriplegia (288/613, 47.0%), both spasticity and dystonia (257/632, 40.7%), walk independently (368/633, 58.1%), eat all food and drink safely by mouth (288/578, 55.9%), and produce understandable speech (249/584, 42.6%). Cortical grey matter injury and duration of initial critical care unit stay affected the odds of walking, oral feeding, and speech (binary logistic regression, p<0.001). Conclusions: We comprehensively captured caregiver and clinician-entered data on 97% of people seen in a tertiary care CP Center and used this data to determine medical features affecting the odds of three functional outcomes. By sharing our methodology, we aim to facilitate replication of this dataset at other sites and grow our understanding of how CP manifests in the US. Article summary: Using caregiver and clinician-entered data on people seen in a tertiary-care CP center, we determined medical features affecting the odds of three functional outcomes. What’s known on this subject: Detailed CP characterization can be limited if using population-based registries and retrospective chart review alone, including limited data on recently validated functional classification systems for CP. What this study adds: We comprehensively captured caregiver and clinician-entered data on 97% of people seen in our CP Center to describe how CP manifests and show that cortical injury and initial ICU stay duration affect the odds of walking, oral feeding, and speech. Contributors Statement: Susie Kim helped design the study, aggregated data, carried out data analyses, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript.Kelsey Steffen helped conceptualize and design the study and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript.Lauren Gottschalk, Jennifer Miros, Katie Leger, Amy Viehoever, and Karen Taca helped design the study and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript.Bhooma Aravamuthan conceptualized and designed the study, supervised data collection and analysis, drafted the initial manuscript, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.