Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211832›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024

Dietary fatty acids and gallstone risk: insights from NHANES and Mendelian randomization analysis.

Minghe Wang, Jintao Guo, Siyu Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minghe WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jintao GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Siyu SunDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prior research suggests polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) may prevent gallstones, but evidence on saturated fatty acids (SFA) and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) is limited. This study aims to explore the associations between fatty acids and gallstones using a large sample of American population and Mendelian randomization (MR) methods. Methods: The cross-sectional study involved 6,629 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2020. Logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were conducted after stratifying by gender subgroups. Two-sample MR analysis was used to explore the causal relationship between fatty acids and gallstones without confounding factors. Results: In females, higher SFA intake was positively associated with gallstone risk, while higher intake of n-3 and n-6 PUFA was negatively associated. No significant associations were found in males. No nonlinear correlations were found in any group by RCS analysis. MR analysis indicated that SFA, n-3, and n-6 PUFA could reduce gallstone risk. Conclusion: The influence of dietary fatty acid composition on gallstone development differs by gender, providing insights into dietary prevention and treatment of gallstones.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studyfatty acidgallstoneMendelian randomizationNHANES

Identifiers

PMID39211832
PMCPMC11358065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.