Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211780›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Diagnostic lncRNA high expression for liver patients prognosis and medication guidance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hengzhou Zhu, Haoyan Chen, Xiaodan Zhu, Baonan Zhang, Chunhui Jin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hengzhou ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Wuxi Hospital of Triditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi, China.
Haoyan ChenDepartment of Respiratory, Wuxi Hospital of Triditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi, China.
Xiaodan ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Wuxi Hospital of Triditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi, China.
Baonan ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Wuxi Hospital of Triditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi, China.
Chunhui JinDepartment of Oncology, Wuxi Hospital of Triditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The study of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has gained significant attention due to their roles in regulating gene expression and their potential as diagnostic biomarkers. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of high-expression lncRNAs in liver disease patients, including those with hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, up to July 2024. Studies were included if they investigated the expression of lncRNAs in liver disease patients and evaluated their diagnostic performance. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Results: Nine studies involving 888 samples were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was 2.01 (95% CI: 1.71-2.36), indicating a significant association between high lncRNA expression and poor liver disease outcomes. Subgroup analyses revealed a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.99 (95% CI: 1.53-2.60) for tissue samples and 8.62 (95% CI: 1.16-63.71) for blood samples, suggesting a stronger diagnostic value for blood-based lncRNAs. The funnel plots indicated minimal publication bias, and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings. Conclusion: High-expression lncRNAs show significant potential as diagnostic biomarkers for liver diseases, offering non-invasive, accurate, and timely diagnostic information. Despite the promising results, further research is needed to standardize detection methods, elucidate the biological functions of lncRNAs, and validate their clinical utility in diverse patient populations. Integrating lncRNA biomarkers with traditional diagnostic approaches could enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve patient management and outcomes in liver disease.

Indexed as

biomarkersdiagnosisliver diseaseslong non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs)meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID39211780
PMCPMC11357924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.