ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Network-based prediction of anti-cancer drug combinations.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Curcumin Synergistically Suppress HER2- Breast Cancer via Lethal ROS and Inhibition of Metastasis.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Precision Medicine Through Network Language: Integrating Clinical Insight and Data Expertise.Genes · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in drug development for delirium and Alzheimer's disease.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Synergistic anticancer effects of camptothecin and sotorasib inFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug combinations have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach in cancer treatment, aimed at overcoming drug resistance and improving the efficacy of monotherapy regimens. However, identifying effective drug combinations has traditionally been time-consuming and often dependent on chance discoveries. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore alternative strategies to support experimental research. In this study, we propose network-based prediction models to identify potential drug combinations for 11 types of cancer. Our approach involves extracting 55,299 associations from literature and constructing human protein interactomes for each cancer type. To predict drug combinations, we measure the proximity of drug-drug relationships within the network and employ a correlation clustering framework to detect functional communities. Finally, we identify 61,754 drug combinations. Furthermore, we analyze the network configurations specific to different cancer types and identify 30 key genes and 21 pathways. The performance of these models is subsequently assessed through
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.