ArticleCJC open2024
Analysis of Transesophageal Echocardiography Appropriateness for Diagnosing Infective Endocarditis: Insights From Two Tertiary-Care Hospitals.
Article in CJC open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transesophageal vs. transthoracic echocardiography for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Echocardiography plays a key role in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE), and recommendations have been published regarding the appropriate use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The objective of this study is to evaluate the utilization of TEE in Regina, Saskatchewan, in the diagnosis of IE. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients aged ≥ 18 years who received a TEE test for the diagnosis of IE from January 1 to December 31, 2019. The primary outcome included the proportion of TEE uses that complied with the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Society of Echocardiography (ACCF and ASE) recommendations and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations. Results: A total of 204 admissions involving 188 patients who had TEE performed for the diagnosis of IE occurred within the study period. The mean age was 53.1 ± 17.1 years. Of the 204 TEE uses, 152 (74.5%) were considered appropriate by the ACCF and ASE recommendations. Having at least one predisposing condition (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.30 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.11-9.04), Conclusions: The current study suggests that the use of TEE in the diagnosis of IE demonstrated variable levels of adherence to recommendations published by the ACCF and ASE and by the ESC, with significant discrepancy between the two.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.