Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211754›Full record

ReviewCJC open2024

Malignant Pericardial Effusion: A Systematic Review.

Sarah E Mudra, Danny Rayes, Ashwin K Kumar, Jason Z Li, Meredith Njus, Kevin McGowan, Charalampos Charalampous, Kazi A Kalam, Alveena Syed, Muhammad Majid and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CJC open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Malignant Pericardial Effusion: Heart-Breaking Tumors.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sarah E MudraDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Danny RayesDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Ashwin K KumarDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Jason Z LiDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Meredith NjusDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Kevin McGowanDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Charalampos CharalampousDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Kazi A KalamDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Alveena SyedCenter for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial Diseases, Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Muhammad MajidCenter for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial Diseases, Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mary SchleicherFloyd D. Loop Memorial Library, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ankit AgrawalCenter for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial Diseases, Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Abdullah YesilyaprakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Allan L KleinCenter for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial Diseases, Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Malignant pericardial effusion (Eff) is often asymptomatic and has an unknown prevalence, due to its occult presentation. The condition often is identified postmortem on autopsy, and it is associated with a poor prognosis. Given the late presentation of malignant pericardial Effs, a minimal volume of literature has examined the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of these complex patients. We conducted a systematic review to advance present understanding of this condition. Methods: A search of 4 databases resulted in 41 case reports meeting criteria. Inclusion criteria were being a patient aged > 18 years who presented with pericardial Eff in the setting of malignancy. Intervention was medical and/or surgical therapy, and the outcome was mortality. Results: For the 41 patients included, the median age was 54 years, and the majority were male patients (58%). Dyspnea was the leading symptom (90%), and cardiac tamponade was present in 78% of cases. Common cancers included lung, gastrointestinal, and renal neoplasms (59%). Pericardiocentesis occurred in 98% of cases, with a median fluid extraction volume of 1000 mL. Death occurred in 44%, primarily due to disease progression and/or metastasis. Conclusions: This study presents the largest systematic review on malignancy-induced pericardial Effs to date. Notably, solid tumours, and specifically lung adenocarcinomas, are common culprits. Malignant pericardial Effs are often severe, with a majority of patients presenting with cardiac tamponade. Overall, treatment options are limited, and the associated mortality rate is high.

Identifiers

PMID39211754
PMCPMC11357784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.