ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2024
Enhanced enrichment of extracellular vesicles for laboratory and clinical research from drop-sized blood samples.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stemness-associated MEF-derived extruded nanovesicles cooperate withNanoscale advances · 2026Article
- A Rapid and High-Recovery Extracellular Vesicle (EVs) Isolation Technique from Blood Samples.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Exosomes in Clinical Laboratory: From Biomarker Discovery to Diagnostic Implementation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Emerging Biomarker Potential of Extracellular Vesicle-Enclosed MicroRNAs for Liver Fibrosis Detection.Cells · 2025Review
- Exosome: an overview on enhanced biogenesis by small molecules.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the realm of biomedical advancement, extracellular vesicles (EVs) are revolutionizing our capacity to diagnose, monitor, and predict disease progression. However, the comprehensive exploration and clinical application of EVs face significant limitations due to the current isolation techniques. The size exclusion chromatography, commercial precipitation reagents, and ultracentrifugation are frequently employed, necessitating skilled operators and entailing challenges related to consistency, reproducibility, quality, and yields. Notably, the formidable challenge of extracellular vesicle isolation persists when dealing with clinical samples of limited availability. This study addresses these challenges by aiming to devise a rapid, user-friendly, and high-recovery EVs isolation technique tailored for blood samples. The NTI-EXO precipitation method demonstrated a 5-fold increase in the recovery of serum EVs compared to current methodologies. Importantly, we illustrate that a mere two drops of blood (∼100 µL) suffice for the recovery of enriched EVs. The integrity and quality of these isolated EVs were rigorously assessed for the size, purity, and contaminants. This method was validated through the successful isolation of EVs from organ transplant recipients to detect disease-specific exosomal markers, including LKB1, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and PD-L1. In conclusion, NTI-EXO method can be used for small clinical samples, thereby advancing discoveries in the EV-centric domain and propelling the frontiers of biomedical research and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.