ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Adequacy of YouTube Videos for Learning Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Educational quality of laparoscopic hysterectomy videos for advanced endometriosis: institutional archives versus YouTube and MedTube.BMC medical education · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimComplete mesocolic excision (CME) is becoming an oncological surgical principle day by day for right hemicolectomy. However, the procedure is technically difficult and carries a higher risk of complications than open surgery. In this study, the adequacy of YouTube videos that facilitate education for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (LRHCME) was investigated.
methodsIn July 2024, in the search bar of the YouTube platform, the term "laparoscopic right hemicolectomy complete mesocolic excision" was searched. The first 100 videos in each search were evaluated. Animations, advertisements, lectures, non-surgical videos (pre-surgery, post-surgery vlog, etc.), and non-English videos were excluded from the study. Steps identified in the Delphi consensus were used to determine the reliability of the videos. The quality of the videos was measured using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the modified DISCERN score.
resultsSeventy videos were included in the evaluation. While 28 (40%) of these videos were classified as reliable, 42 (60%) were not found reliable. In reliable videos, video description, HD resolution, GQS, modified DISCERN, and duration were significantly higher (p-value <0.001, 0.012, <0.001, <0.001, 0.041 respectively). Reliable videos had a better rank than unreliable videos (p=0.046).
conclusionWhen evaluated according to Delphi consensus, the most of LRHCME videos on the YouTube platform were unreliable. We conclude that YouTube alone is insufficient for learning LRHCME without a professional instructor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.