ReviewCureus2024
Exploring Salivary Biomarkers for Tumor Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salivary Proteome Role in Infection and Immunity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Emerging Salivary Exosome Nanodiagnostics for Early Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Platforms, Biomarkers, and Future Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- From gut to mouth: salivary signatures of carcinogenic microbiota.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of salivary cytokine profiles in newly diagnosed pediatric patients with cancer and healthy children.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Periodontal Molecular Diagnostics: State of Knowledge and Future Prospects for Clinical Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A promising method for non-invasive cancer diagnosis and prognosis is through salivary biomarkers. By utilizing the distinct characteristics of saliva and the progress made in biomarker studies, these markers provide more accurate diagnoses for a wider range of malignancies. An attempt was made to thoroughly investigate the field of salivary biomarkers for tumor prognosis and diagnosis, with an emphasis on their use in various cancer forms. Predetermined search criteria were utilized for a systematic search across numerous databases for peer-reviewed papers from 2009 to 2021. Studies concentrating on the detection, validation, and clinical use of salivary biomarkers for different types of cancers were included in the inclusion criteria. Initially, 238 articles were found, of which 15 relevant articles satisfied the inclusion requirements. Information on study aims, methodology, findings, and conclusions were gathered for data extraction. We identified recurrent themes, patterns, and contradictions by a thematic analysis. We also assessed state-of-the-art salivary biomarkers for tumor diagnosis and prognosis. One major finding is the identification of biomolecules in saliva linked to several cancer forms, including pancreatic, oral, breast, lung, and stomach cancers. There is an increasing amount of evidence demonstrating the value of saliva-based diagnostics in oncology. This is due to new detection methods and developments in salivary proteomics and genomics. Identification of exosomes and microvesicles as salivary biomarker profiles offered molecular understandings of the etiology and evolution of cancer, thereby opening new avenues for diagnosis and treatment. Salivary biomarkers are a non-invasive approach for the early detection and prediction of cancer, thanks to the unique properties of saliva and advancements in biomarker research. This potential revolution could enhance patient outcomes and reduce cancer-related deaths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.