Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39211663›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Barriers to Point-of-Care Ultrasound Utilization Among Emergency Medicine Residents in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Fahad Abuguyan, Naief W Almasry, Ali A Alzahrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fahad AbuguyanEmergency Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Naief W AlmasryEmergency Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Ali A AlzahraniEmergency Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly recognized as a valuable diagnostic tool in emergency medicine (EM). This study aimed to identify barriers to POCUS utilization among EM residents in the Riyadh region. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn observational cross-sectional study was conducted among 116 EM residents from various training centers in Riyadh. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires assessing demographics, ultrasound (US) training, perceived barriers, and facilitators to POCUS usage. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, multiple response dichotomy analysis, and multivariable linear regression.

resultsThe majority of residents had completed US training and recognized the importance of POCUS in emergency settings. However, significant barriers were identified, including time constraints and logistical challenges. Multivariable regression analysis revealed associations between residents' training status, beliefs in incentives, anticipated POCUS use, and perceived barriers.

conclusionThis study highlights the importance of addressing barriers to POCUS integration into residency programs. Efforts should focus on optimizing training, addressing workflow challenges, and enhancing residents' confidence in POCUS utilization. Targeted interventions tailored to specific clinical contexts may facilitate greater acceptance and integration of POCUS into routine practice.

Indexed as

barriersbedside ultrasonographyemergency departmentsemergency residencypoint-of-care-ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39211663
PMCPMC11361400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.