ArticleCureus2024
Validation of Age Estimation Using the Compositional Variation of Dental Hard Tissue: An X-ray Diffraction Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction X-rays and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two non-destructive techniques that determine a material's crystallographic structure, chemical composition, and physical properties. They can also be used to estimate a person's age when it is unknown, assess the need for orthodontic treatment, or predict the likelihood of tooth decay. This research aims to validate the accuracy of age estimation through X-ray diffraction analysis of tooth hard tissue with compositional changes. Methodology Four tooth samples were analyzed using the Pan Analytical XRD (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., UK) unique d8 family platform, which uses Cu Kα radiation (0.154 nm) and a 0.02° scan rate from 0 to 80°. Results The angle of incidence (ω) is established between the sample and the X-ray source. The angle of diffraction, 2θ, is established between the detector and the incident beam. The detector angle 2θ and the incident angle ω always equal half. Inter-atomic distance, or d-spacing (D = 10^-8 cm in Angstrom units), is measured. A greater crystal size or a greater degree of crystallinity may be indicated by a higher peak intensity, which translates to an increased amount of atoms in the crystal. Conclusion The study's findings suggest that XRD is a promising new technique for age determination, as it has an advanced and dynamic approach to finding the crystallographic characteristics of the provided sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.