ReviewCureus2024
The Utilization of Brillouin Microscopy in Corneal Diagnostics: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual Optical Elastography Techniques Reveal the Regulation of Corneal Stiffness by Collagen XIV.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- Unlocking the therapeutic potential of cellular mechanobiology.Science advances · 2025Review
- Application of the Brillouin Optical Scanning System in the Regional Corneal Biomechanical Evaluation of Keratoconus and Its Correlation with Corvis ST Parameters.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing UVA and Laser-Induced Crosslinking via Brillouin Microscopy.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- The Application of Terahertz Technology in Corneas and Corneal Diseases: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparison of biomechanical indices measured by ocular response analyzer between children and elderly: a systematic review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Corneal biomechanical data has been used since 2005 to screen for keratoconus and corneal ectasia by corneal specialists. Older technology uses force applanation techniques over a 3 mm area in the central cornea, making it highly dependent on extraneous variables and unable to calculate the elasticity of the tissue. Brillouin microscopy is a newer method that uses a natural shift in the frequency of light as it passes through a material. This frequency shift can be used to estimate the viscoelasticity of the tissue. The advantage of Brillouin microscopy is that it can create a full three-dimensional (3D) map of the entire cornea without direct contact. A literature search was conducted using the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Ovid regarding the applications of Brillouin microscopy in corneal diagnostics. A final total of 16 articles was included describing the various ex vivo and in vivo studies conducted using Brillouin microscopy. Applications of this technology spanned from keratoconus diagnosis to post-corneal refractive surgery evaluation. All studies evaluated corneal biomechanics and other corneal properties through the quantification of Brillouin frequency shifts. Many of the studies found that this diagnostic device is capable of detecting subtle changes in corneal thickness and biomechanics in keratoconic corneas at a high level of specificity and sensitivity. However, limitations of Brillouin microscopy may include the duration of time required for use and fluctuations in accuracy depending on the corneal hydration state. Future technology seems to be geared toward a combination of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Brillouin microscopy, using OCT as a three-dimensional pupil-tracking modality. Further research and understanding of the technology involved will lead to better care of patients in the field of ophthalmology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.