ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2024
Effect of Axillary Radiograph Rotation and Medial Scapular Visualization on Glenoid Retroversion Measurement.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing glenoid orientation on the axillary view: a novel technique using the posterolateral acromion-to-coracoid line.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Axillary radiographs enable the measurement of glenoid retroversion, which is associated with worsened clinical outcomes and glenoid loosening following total shoulder arthroplasty. Due to the variability in radiographic technique, this study aims to determine if the accuracy of retroversion measured by axillary radiograph is affected by 1) scapular rotation and/or 2) proper visualization of the medial scapula. Methods: Using five cadaveric scapulae, investigators obtained axillary radiographs in true neutral position as well as in 10° and 20° of anterior and posterior rotation. For each radiograph, two fellowship trained shoulder surgeons measured glenoid retroversion with complete visualization of the scapula (Technique 1) and with visualization limited to the lateral half of scapula (Technique 2). The observers also measured glenoid retroversion by CT scan to use as a gold standard technique. Spearman's Rho was used to assess agreement between measurements. Results: Average glenoid retroversion of the five scapulae assessed by CT scan was 3.8° (R: 1.5-6.9). Measurements obtained using Technique 1 demonstrated improved levels of interobserver agreement (ICC: 0.412) compared to measurements obtained with Technique 2, which demonstrated no agreement (ICC: 0.103). Scapular rotation was inconsistently associated with agreement using both techniques. Conclusion: The reliability of glenoid retroversion measurements was limited by incomplete visualization of the medial scapular spine. When measuring retroversion to the base of the scapular spine, improved agreement and accuracy were seen with various degrees of scapular rotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.